SCOTUS Snapshot: Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump and Trump v. V.O.S. Selections
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments today in two consolidated cases filed by several small businesses and 12 states. These cases challenge President Trump’s authority to impose tariffs on goods imported into the United States.
Legal Basis for Tariffs
President Trump invoked the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to justify the tariffs. Under IEEPA, the president has authority to address any unusual and extraordinary threat to U.S. national security, foreign policy, or economy, including threats originating partly outside the country.
The Act permits the president, during a national emergency, to regulate the import or export of property involving foreign interests.
Implications of the Decision
This ruling will impact every American consumer and business, as well as all foreign countries engaged in trade with the United States.
Arguments from Both Sides
- The Trump administration argues the tariffs fall within IEEPA's scope, stating that the power to regulate importation includes the power to impose tariffs.
- Opponents contend that using IEEPA to authorize tariffs violates the major questions doctrine, which prevents the president from making significant economic decisions without explicit Congressional approval.
“The power to regulate importation includes the power to impose tariffs.”
The major questions doctrine bars the president from making economic decisions without clear authorization from Congress.
Author's summary: The Supreme Court's decision on the extent of presidential power under IEEPA to impose tariffs will significantly affect U.S. foreign trade and domestic economic policy.