CFIA Ostrich Cull to Proceed After Supreme Court Decision
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal from a British Columbia ostrich farm seeking to halt the cull ordered by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA).
Legal Perspectives on the Case
Toronto lawyer Glenford Jameson, specializing in regulatory law and familiar with CFIA cases, shared insights on the legal implications. He noted the case combines social, political, and legal aspects.
“This is a really interesting case because it brings together social, political and legal elements.”
Jameson explained that the Supreme Court’s dismissal was expected since the core issue focused on a narrow administrative question: whether the CFIA properly evaluated its options before ordering the cull.
Regarding further legal options for the farm, Jameson said that reconsideration of the court's decision is only possible under exceptional circumstances involving new evidence, making further appeal unlikely.
“In truly exceptional cases the court can reconsider a leave decision — but unless new evidence comes to light, this is essentially a dead end.”
CFIA's Reputation and Procedures
Jameson acknowledged occasional criticisms of CFIA’s approach but affirmed the agency is internationally respected and follows proper protocols.
“I fuss with CFIA on a regular basis, but they are internationally respected.”
He also differentiated public perception of poor communication from actual procedural failings by the agency.
Community Impact
Edgewood resident James McKee has publicly highlighted community tensions arising from the legal dispute surrounding the ostrich cull.
Reporter's Note
I’m Tanya Fletcher, a national reporter with CBC in B.C., based in Vancouver, coordinating coverage and gathering national reactions from my colleagues on the ground.
Summary: The Supreme Court’s dismissal of the BC ostrich farm’s appeal confirms CFIA’s authority to order the cull, reflecting careful legal and procedural consideration despite community tensions.